Chatbot-Driven Voting Aid Applications Increase Knowledge about Party Positions but Do Not Change Party Evaluations

13 June 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Voting Aid Applications (VAAs) are interactive tools that communicate information about elections, yet their effectiveness in enhancing political knowledge and participation remains understudied. Moreover, traditional VAAs may disproportionately attract politically engaged users with already well-formed ideological views, limiting their potential to inform a broader and less engaged electorate. This paper introduces a novel “VAA Bot” that employs large language models and retrieval-augmented generation to deliver balanced, personalized information drawn from official party documents. We evaluate the VAA Bot’s impact across three experimental studies aimed at young adults. The findings provide evidence that the VAA Bot improves knowledge of party stances. However, we observe weaker effects on downstream outcomes such as vote preferences and party evaluations. These findings contribute to ongoing debates about the role of political information in shaping behavior and underscore both the promise and the limitations of LLM-based tools for civic learning.

Keywords

generative AI
voting advice applications
large language models
issue voting
young voters

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.