IDP Return and Social Cohesion: Evidence from Camp Closures in Iraq

11 July 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

After the resolution of a civil conflict, how does the return of the internally displaced population (IDPs) impact social cohesion? Little attention has been paid to the consequences of IDP return, despite extensive research on the causes and effects of displacement. I investigate this question in Iraq after the the Islamic State. Camp closures by the federal government starting in 2019 forced hundreds of thousands of internal migrants to return. The exogenous timing of the closures provides a unique setting to estimate a plausibly causal effect of return. Leveraging village-level displacement data, community assessments, respondent-level surveys, and qualitative fieldwork, I find that the closure-induced returns frayed social cohesion. My theory provides a critical mechanism underpinning this relationship: return creates communal tensions by inducing fear and suspicion. These findings hold significant policy implications, as the approach of post-conflict governments to address internal migration profoundly influences the social legacy of civil conflicts.

Keywords

civil conflict
terrorism
social cohesion
forced migration
internal displacement
reintegration

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.