From Reporting Delay to Conspiracy Theory: An Analysis of the 2020 Iowa Democratic Caucuses

24 July 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

In 2020, the Iowa caucuses became the focus of controversy due to issues with a mobile application used to report precinct-level results. This caused significant reporting delays, raised concerns about electoral integrity, and ultimately led the Iowa Democratic Party to abandon the traditional caucus system in 2024. Using survey data from a nationally representative sample of 10,300 U.S. adults collected shortly after the 2020 caucuses, we show that predispositions toward conspiratorial thinking and low levels of political knowledge strongly predict conspiratorial beliefs about the incident, while political orientations play a relatively minor role. These findings highlight the critical role of political information in shaping interpretations of electoral controversies.

Keywords

Election Integrity
Iowa Caucuses
Conspiracy Theories

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.