Resolving Political Conflict Through Continuous Improvement: The PEACE Framework as a Strategic Model for Sustainable Peacebuilding

18 August 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Purpose: To introduce and validate the PEACE framework as a structured, continuous improvement-based model for conflict resolution. Design/Methodology/Approach: The article synthesizes strategic planning, DMAIC methodology, and Theory of Constraints into a five-stage framework—Planning, Evaluation, Actuation, Constraint, and Endurance/Sustainability. It applies the model to two geopolitical conflicts to demonstrate its practical relevance. Findings: The PEACE framework enables adaptive, evidence-driven conflict resolution. Its feedback loop promotes iterative learning and strategic alignment, addressing common failure factors in peacebuilding. Practical Implications: Applicable to international diplomacy, community mediation, and educational policy reform. Offers a replicable model for structured intervention and long-term peace sustainability. Originality/Value: Combines quality assurance principles with conflict resolution theory. Introduces a visual metaphor and strategic roadmap for enduring peace

Keywords

Conflict Resolution
Continuous Improvement
Strategic Planning
DMAIC
Theory of Constraints
Peacebuilding
Educational Policy
Comparative Frameworks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.