China’s Health Diplomacy and Soft Power Play in Chile and Argentina: A Cross-Country Comparison

18 August 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

China's growing influence in Latin America has drawn increasing attention in academia. Past research has focused on trade and investment, this study examines China’s health diplomacy during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a comparative case study approach, it contrasts the responses of Chile and Argentina to Chinese health outreach. Despite receiving similar support, Chile has generally welcomed Chinese assistance, while Argentina has experienced anti-China protests and skepticism regarding Chinese vaccines. The study seeks to advance the understanding of soft power by exploring its relationship to domestic politics. Through semi-structured interviews with key healthcare professionals, including former Ministers of Health, the research highlights that the political environment in recipient countries significantly shapes the success of soft power initiatives. The findings suggest that when citizens perceive their leaders to prioritize personal interests over national welfare, they may be less receptive to foreign influence, offering new perspectives for global health diplomacy.

Keywords

Latin America
Soft Power
China
Pandemic
Health Diplomacy

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.