The Effects of Political Shocks on Aggregate Vote Preferences in the 2024 Election

27 August 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

The 2024 presidential election campaigns were shaken by series of extraordinary events, among them Trump’s felony conviction , Biden’s disastrous debate performance, Trump’s attempted assassination, Harris’s replacement of Biden, and Harris’s superior performance her debate with Trump. To what extend did these events shift intended presidential votes? I address this question through analysis of data from more than 320 surveys taken over the course of the campaign that asked respondents how they intended to vote in the presidential election. I find that the shocks had statistically significant but, with one exception, very small substantive effects on the prospective major-party votes of the electorate as a whole. The shocks had a much stronger effect on support for the Democratic candidate than on support for Trump. They left partisans largely unmoved; independent voters were much more responsive and thus accounted for most of movement in overall aggregate preferences that followed each event.

Keywords

2024 election
presidential debates
Trump
Harris
Biden

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.