During Good Behavior: The Evolution of Judicial Conduct Code Enforcement

03 September 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

The federal government has looked to its 50 laboratories of democracy when deciding what changes to adopt nationwide. In this article, I argue the federal government should look once more at how states address judicial misconduct to create a formal process addressing U.S. Supreme Court misconduct. By examining the development of judicial conduct commissions in both Georgia and Tennessee, the federal government can determine how to create a commission responsible for code enforcement for the highest court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court.

Keywords

judicial misconduct
accountability
intergovermental relations

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.