Problematising consent: reading first-person testimonies of faculty-student relationships

29 September 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Despite the proliferation of increasingly stringent policies regulating professor-student sexual relationships, sexualized abuses of power by university faculty remain pervasive. These policies harness a key insight from second-wave feminists: that power structures make it hard for a student to say no to her teacher. We take their insights further, and look into the structures that mediate how women students’ testimonies are dismissed and distorted through the discourse on consent. We employ thick descriptive, feminist phenomenological analyses of two first-person testimonials to show that consent has at least three deleterious effects: 1) the atomisation of students’ experiences, making the sexualised abuse of power appear less public and less severe (atomisation), 2) de-contextualisation of students’ accounts by denuding them of their pedagogical context, thus rendering the inherent power asymmetry invisible (de-contextualisation), and 3) locating the responsibility for any harm with the student-victim, thus making the institution invisible and unaccountable (displacement of responsibility).

Keywords

consent
sexism
higher education
institutional violence
feminist phenomenology

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.