Disproportionality at Fair Elections Cannot Exceed 1/sqrt(2): A Note on the Gallagher Index and a New Normalised Measure

16 September 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

The Gallagher index of disproportionality is perhaps the most popular measure of electoral distortion in all of political science. While many assume that the index ranges from 0 (perfect proportionality) to 1 (perfect disproportionality), I prove that in any free and fair election its maximum possible value is bounded above by sqrt((N-1)/(2N)), reaching a maximum of 1/sqrt(2) where the number of parties, N, tends to infinity. This bound arises in the limiting case where all parties receive equal vote shares but only one secures representation. Building on this result, I then propose a new normalised version of the index that rescales disproportionality to lie between 0 and 1 under democratic conditions.

Keywords

Gallagher index
Disproportionality
Proportionality
Electoral systems
Party systems

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.