Green Industrial Policy in the Voting Booth: The Electoral Effects of the Inflation Reduction Act

26 February 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

The Inflation Reduction Act is the most significant climate mitigation policy ever adopted by the United States. We analyze the electoral effects of this large-scale green industrial policy in the 2024 election. Because the policy promises near-term benefits with few direct costs, it is a most likely case for generating electoral support and avoiding voter backlash. Using a difference-in-differences approach and entropy balancing, we compare vote outcomes in counties that receive IRA-induced private sector investment to observationally similar counties without investment. Looking across presidential, congressional, and gubernatorial elections, we find that the policy did not generate consistent electoral rewards or punishment. We provide several potential explanations for the results. The findings stand in contrast to previous studies that find incumbents are punished for significant climate reforms.

Keywords

Climate change
Green industrial policy
Electoral effects

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.