Global Gateway: A Strategic Approach to Addressing Accountability Gaps

19 March 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

The paper examines the EU’s Global Gateway’s legal and institutional design to assess whether it ensures accountability and enforceable responsibility, focusing on Africa and the digital governance pillar. It combines analysis of legal and quasi-legal documents with a case study of the Data Governance in Africa Initiative, situated within scholarship on EU–Africa digital cooperation and AU data governance. This qualitative, doctrinal approach traces how obligations move through the “Team Europe” architecture, from the European Commission and Member States to implementing agencies and African regulators, identifying where accountability fragments. The paper argues that the absence of a clear locus of responsibility weakens transparency, complicates remedies for African partners, and undermines the EU’s claim to normative leadership. It proposes mechanisms such as outcome-linked disbursement, co-signature clauses, and stronger transparency in MoUs to make multi-actor cooperation frameworks more enforceable and equitable.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.