The Limits to Growth and Cold War Political Economy: Normative Structure in Global Systems Modeling

27 April 2026, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

The Limits to Growth (1972), prepared by an MIT group for the Club of Rome, is widely studied as an ecological forecast. This article reinterprets it as a normative artifact embedded in the political economy of the Cold War. Shifting attention from empirical accuracy to the normative structure of its scenario design, the article argues that the World3 architecture constructs an implicit hierarchy of development trajectories: all growth-premised paths — capitalist or socialist — lead to collapse, while only simultaneous stabilization of population, industrial capital, and pollution avoids it. The analysis does not posit intentional political design; abstraction from property relations, class conflict, and geopolitical asymmetries instead converts ecological limits into a universal managerial problem with asymmetric consequences for competing systems. The article contributes to political economy, environmental governance, and science and technology studies by treating global models as knowledge artifacts that define the possibilities of governance.

Keywords

Limits to Growth
World3
Club of Rome
Cold War
political economy
systems dynamics
environmental governance
global modeling
growth legitimacy

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.