Designed Buffers: How Swiss Institutions Decouple Elite Polarization from Mass Affective Hostility

18 May 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Switzerland presents a puzzle for theories that link elite polarization to mass affective animosity. Over three decades the Swiss People's Party rose from roughly 15 to 28 percent of the vote, the Federal Council has moved from amicable agreement toward open elite conflict, and observers classify the party system as among the most ideologically divided in Western Europe. Yet new long-run survey and behavioural evidence shows that mass affective polarization rose once between 1999 and 2003 and has not moved since, while geographic vote congruence between local populations has increased. Standard psychological, informational, and elite-driven accounts cannot accommodate this decoupling. Through analytical case- mechanism tracing, this paper argues that Swiss institutional architecture functions as a designed buffer system: three coupled affordances absorb elite antagonism without permitting it to compound into ambient mass hostility. Federalism with strong subsidiarity provides identity-salience offsets that prevent partisanship from consolidating into a master identity.

Keywords

consociational democracy
direct democracy
federalism
institutional design
Switzerland
affordances
Affective polarisation

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.