Abstract
The number of openly LGBTQ legislators serving in American state legislatures has increased substantially over the last two decades, yet descriptive representation does not necessarily translate into equal institutional power. This study examines whether LGBTQ legislators possess the same opportunities for legislative influence as their non-LGBTQ counterparts. Drawing on theories of representation and institutional gatekeeping, the paper argues that inequalities in policymaking influence emerge less through electoral exclusion and more through disparities in access to leadership positions, agenda-setting authority, and legislative networks.

![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://preprints.apsanet.org/engage/assets/public/apsa/logo/orcid.png)