Nativism and EU Border Externalization in Tunisia: Exporting Borders, Producing Impunity

26 May 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Recently, the European Union (EU) has signed border externalization agreements with several North African countries to manage migration and curb people smuggling. Border externalization is presented as supporting safe migration management, but the experiences of those subjected to border violence and operations point to weak safeguards, blurred responsibility, limited oversight, and rising impunity. This paper uses critical policy analysis, informed by the theory of nativism, to examine how safe third country (STC) classification operationalize exclusion within the EU externalization regime. Drawing on policy documents, NGO reports, and media coverage, it shows how nativist politics shape restrictive migration governance. The paper argues that these arrangements expose migrants and asylum seekers to violence while shielding EU actors from accountability. It contends that STC designation provides an unreliable basis for treating Tunisia as a safe site of externalized border control and highlights the need for binding legal duties, independent monitoring, and enforceable accountability.

Keywords

border externalization
border work
migration policy
safe third country
Tunisia

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.