Cuba, Migration Leverage, and the Mariel Precedent: A Policy Analysis

28 May 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

This policy analysis argues that U.S. policy toward Cuba functions as a form of coercive pressure whose costs fall heavily on ordinary Cubans. It connects embargoes, oil restrictions, and recent legal actions against Cuban leaders to a broader strategy designed to force political change. Drawing on the 1980 Mariel boatlift and the scholarly debate about its labor market effects, the analysis examines whether migration can operate as diplomatic leverage. The central claim is that the Mariel precedent reveals a contradiction in U.S. policy: Washington endorses Cuban freedom in principle, but faces political constraints when Cuban mobility becomes immediate and large scale.

Keywords

Cuba
Mariel boatlift
Migration diplomacy
U.S. foreign policy
Collective punishment
Coercive diplomacy
Immigration policy
Political economy
Florida

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.