The No Party System - Combining Democracy and Meritocracy

10 June 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

The US Founding Fathers were against factionalism which is the institution of political parties, yet the system they devised with the help of later Congresses almost guaranteed the rise of political parties. As a result, the US is basically a two party political system with one member districts in the House of Representatives. China, on the other hand, is a one party system comprised of scholar bureaucrats who for most of China's 5000 year history have had to pass a strict examination based on Confucian ethics. Whereas the US is a democracy based on 'one person, one vote', China is a meritocracy based on an Imperial exam system and local experience requirements in order to get the best and brightest into the Chinese bureaucracy. We devise a hypothetical political system which combines these two ideals - democracy and meritocracy - in the form of a no party system.

Keywords

Democracy
Meritocracy

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.