Political Polarization, Incumbents’ Personalist Ambitions, and Democratic Backsliding: A Cross-National Quantitative Analysis

01 June 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

A growing body of research highlights the potential threat political polarization poses to democracy. However, few studies directly, systematically, and rigorously examine the impact of polarization on democratic backsliding, explore the heterogeneity of its effects, and uncover the micro-level psychological mechanisms underlying this heterogeneity. Drawing on cross-national data at both macro and micro levels, this article further demonstrates that a higher level of polarization in a democratic country tends to bring a lower level of democracy; moreover, the adverse effect of polarization is amplified by the personalist ambitions of incumbents, and the mass-psychological foundation underlying this heterogeneous effect is that polarization makes citizens more likely to endorse personalist politics. This research integrates environmental, actor-centric, and mass-psychological explanations, thereby offering a more comprehensive understanding of the global rise of democratic backsliding.

Keywords

Political Polarization
Democratic Backsliding
Personalism

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.