The Unitary Executive and Trump: How Lawyers Undermine the Constitutional Presidency

31 July 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Donald Trump has exhibited the same behaviors in his second term as he did in the business world: headstrong, impulsive, demanding, erratic, insistent on personal loyalty from those around him, impatient with procedural niceties, and contemptuous of the rule of law. Yet President Trump in office has not behaved as a lone wolf. His actions have been buttressed, fortified, and legitimized by those around him via two related recent constitutional theories: Originalism and the Unitary executive. This paper examines how the Unitary theory was spun and legitimized by the conservative legal community, despite the fact that the Unitary theory largely contradicts the very Constitution it claims to extol. The Unitary theory’s profound influence was built in a field of study, law, that has proven itself a breeding ground for wayward constitutional theorizing for reasons that this paper examines. Unitary adherents have been the largely unseen handmaidens of Trump’s power expressions.

Keywords

American presidency
Unitary executive
Originalism
Donald Trump
legal education and law reviews

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.