Border Externalization and Violence Along Migration Routes: Evidence from "Remain in Mexico"

31 July 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

How does migration enforcement in transit countries affect security? As border externalization — where migration destination states pressure transit countries to intensify migration enforcement — becomes a central tool of migration governance, its downstream effects remain poorly understood. We theorize that border externalization can increase violence along migration routes by creating incentives for high capital criminal organizations to enter and control the migrant sector. We evaluate this theory by studying the 2019 Migrant Protection Protocols (or “Remain in Mexico"), which pushed Mexico to crack down on migration along its own southern border. Using original data on migration routes, we show that Remain in Mexico increased homicides along migrant routes, and is associated with increased cartel presence and cartel exploitation of migrants. By tracing the consequences of migration policy beyond the borders of destination states, this study shows how externalized border enforcement can undermine security.

Keywords

Migration
Criminal Violence
Security
Border Externalization

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.