Anatomy of a Legislature: Explaining Legislative Incivility with Fenno’s Committee Framework

20 August 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Incivility has been a growing concern among observers of legislatures both at the national and state levels. Characteristics like full-time legislatures, high income inequality, high electoral competition, large rural populations, term limits, and conservative majorities correlate with reports of more incivility. But under what institutional conditions do legislators become "uncivil"? Is it strategic or emotional? What are some triggers or incentives? What does “incivility” even mean? Political psychologists have neglected legislators. This study peers into the legislative black box via interviews with state representatives to answer these questions. Fenno’s framework of Congressional committees is used for interview design and analysis to great effect. I describe how institutional features incentivize, guide, and sometimes prevent disruptive behavior. I also find that chair leadership styles warrant further study, which I tackle in a different chapter.

Keywords

political psychology
richard fenno
legislators
qualitative

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.