Towards a Politics of Video Games: Conceptualizing the Study of Video Games in Political Science

11 September 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

The study of video games in political science remains fragmented and underdeveloped. Political science has examined other cultural mediums, from television to cinema, yet left video games, which offer deeper immersion and now dwarf both in scale, a niche area of study. This is a grave blind spot: video games transmit political meaning to global audiences, and are political objects shaped by the same regulatory, industrial, and geopolitical forces political science studies elsewhere. This article proposes two subfields: games as sites of political meaning, and games as political objects, examining how games are regulated and operate within global governance. Within each, I put forward foundational concepts: virtual agency and representational politics for the former, gaming spheres of influence, governance, and political economy for the latter. Four case studies, Silent Hill f, Cyberpunk 2077, Fallout 4, and Black Myth: Wukong, demonstrate these concepts, establishing the first research agenda for this field.

Keywords

video games
political science
game studies
comparative politics
games as sites of political meaning
games as political objects

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.