Artificial Proximity: Policy Diffusion in China’s East–West Pairings

31 August 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

China’s East–West Pairing programme has centrally assigned more developed eastern regions to support poorer western regions since 1996. This paper asks whether pairing transfers the richer partner’s policies and practices to the poorer partner. Combining difference-in-differences analysis of a policy-text similarity index from 2006 to 2022 with a fieldwork case study, we find no detectable average convergence in binding- norm policy text after designation despite the channels for exchange created by the programme. The case study shows that these channels transfer working practices and create personal ties, while partner dissimilarity and accountability pressures may help explain why these exchanges do not appear as convergence in codified policy.

Keywords

China
East–West Pairings
Policy Diffusion
Regional Inequality

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Online appendix
Description
Online appendix
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.