Openness in Practice in Qualitative Research



The discipline of political science has been engaged in discussion about when, why, and how to make scholarship more open for at least three decades.This piece argues that the best way to resolve our differences and develop appropriate norms and guidelines for making different types of qualitative research more open is to move from “if” to “how” – for individual political scientists to make their work more open – generating examples from which we can learn and on which we can build. We begin by articulating a series of principles that underlie our views on openness. We then consider the “state of the debate,” briefly outlining the contours of the scholarship on openness in political and other social sciences, highlighting the fractured nature of the discussion. The heart of the piece considers various strategies, illustrated by exemplary applications, for making qualitative research more open.


Thumbnail image of PS_OpennessInQualitative_KapiszewskiKarcher.pdf


Log in or register with APSA to comment
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .