Methodology

Methodology

Transparency in Practice in Qualitative Research

Diana Kapiszewski Georgetown University
,
Sebastian Karcher Author ORCID home | opens in new tab Qualitative Data Repository
Abstract
The discipline of political science has been engaged in discussion about when, why, and how to make scholarship more transparent for at least three decades. This piece argues that qualitative researchers can achieve transparency in diverse ways, using techniques and strategies that allow them to balance and optimize among competing considerations that affect the pursuit of transparency.. We begin by considering the “state of the debate,” briefly outlining the contours of the scholarship on transparency in political and other social sciences, which so far has focussed mostly on questions of “whether” and “what” to share. We investigate competing considerations that researchers have to consider when working towards transparent research. The heart of the piece considers various strategies, illustrated by exemplary applications, for making qualitative research more transparent.
Summary of changes from Version 1
Significant revisions based on reviewer comments. While structure and argument have changed, the surveyed transparency strategies remain largely the same.
Content
Thumbnail image of content item
Comments
Log in using your APSA account or Register to comment
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.