Censorship Can be Counterproductive: Sensitivity and Media Credibility

26 August 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Censorship constitutes an important pillar of effective governance in China. By drawing a connection between government censorship and media credibility, this paper tries to answer the following question: could government censorship be counter-productive by increasing the credibility of political rumors in China? Using a combination of statistical regression and qualitative interviews, I find mixed evidence on censorship effectiveness in China. On one hand, the results suggest that government censorship can unexpectedly increase the credibility of politically sensitive information because people are more likely to believe in the rumor when they think it is more likely to be censored. On the other hand, the results also hint on censorship effectiveness by increasing people's trust in state media over foreign news when it comes to a public crisis in China, even though citizens understand that the official media is being censored and controlled by the government.

Keywords

political communication
political rumor
social media
government censorship
China

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplement Material
Description
Pilot survey results, survey questions, interview questions, and acknowledgement
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.