Politics of Gender

Seat Safety and Female (Under)representation in the U.S. Congress

Akhil Rajan Yale University
,
Alexander Kustov Yale University
,
Maikol Cerda Yale University
,
Frances Rosenbluth Yale University
,
Ian Shapiro Yale University

Abstract

Women have made significant strides toward equal representation within the U.S. Congress, but their seat share has mostly increased within the Democratic—but not Republican—Party. We argue that one driver of women’s underrepresentation among Republicans is the proliferation of safe seats. Because safe seats encourage ideological extremism in candidates and because women are stereotyped as more liberal than men, we expect women candidates to outperform men in safer Democratic seats but underperform men in safer Republican seats (relative to more competitive seats). Based on a new dataset linking all candidates for the U.S. House and their districts’ partisan composition since 2000, we show women both enter and win elections in safer Republican (Democratic) seats at relatively lower (higher) rates than men. Our results strikingly suggest that, even conditional on running, a female Republican candidate has an overall better chance of winning in a competitive seat than in a safe Republican seat.

Content

Thumbnail image of Seat Safety and Gender Representation_APSA.pdf
download asset Seat Safety and Gender Representation_APSA.pdf 0.55 MB [opens in a new tab]

Comments

Log in or register with APSA to comment [opens in a new tab]
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .