Selecting an Advisor: Professional and Personal Considerations

27 January 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

One of the most impactful decisions made by graduate students during their time in graduate school is that of selecting an advisor. Advisors serve many crucial roles in the graduate school experience beyond just as dissertation chair, typically assisting their students in learning the social and professional norms of the discipline. This chapter provides guidance for graduate students in selecting their advisor, outlining the many positive and negative factors for students to consider. The chapter will encourage students to seek additional mentors from among other faculty and colleagues. Lastly, the chapter examines the role that race, gender, and other lived experiences play in the mentoring process, seeking to expose and combat inequities often reinforced by the advisor/mentor relationship. ​​“This manuscript is part of Strategies for Navigating Graduate School and Beyond, a forthcoming volume for those interested in pursuing graduate education in political science (Fall 2022 publication).”

Keywords

Strategies for Grad School

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.