Comparative Politics

Presidentialism with Parliamentarian Constitutionalism in Brazil: the Inquiry of the End of the World and unchecked judicial imbalances

Authors

Abstract

Brazil’s Supreme Court has launched and presided over investigation procedures on alleged fake news. The so-called “Inquiry of the End of the World” (Inquérito do Fim do Mundo) was initiated by the President of the Court Justice Toffoli, overseen by another member of the Court Justice Moraes (also rapporteur). Brazil’s Constitution require different acts to be performed by different actors. By due process, the police investigate, prosecutors accuse, and judges judge. In the Inquiry of the End of the World, judges investigate, prosecute and judge. In a surprisingly evident festival of illegal acts, the rapporteur ordered searches and seizures, censorship, and arrests. Is Brazil’s Supreme Court stepping out of its constitutional mandate and limits? What impacts can such developments have on Brazilian Checks and Balances? How does this phenomenon fit within traditional literature on Coalitional Presidentialism in Latin America, especially Brazil?

Content

Thumbnail image of APSA 2022 ANDRADE SANTOS SALDANHA JESUS (1).pdf

Comments

Log in or register with APSA to comment
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .