Raising the Stakes on a Political Science Major Field Test: Evidence from a New Capstone Course

30 January 2023, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Using a major field test (MFT) is a common method of program assessment. For accurate assessment to take place, however, students must be sufficiently motivated to perform. This paper studies a change in major requirements that associates a major field test to a grade in a capstone course, when it previously counted for nothing. After controlling for possibly confounding factors, a modest but robust treatment effect was found. Adding stakes also appears to cause MFT scores to correlate more strongly with other measures of student learning, which suggests more accurate assessment.

Keywords

Capstone
Major Field Test
Assessment
Program Assessment
ETS

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.