Abstract
Using a major field test (MFT) is a common method of program assessment. For accurate assessment to take place, however, students must be sufficiently motivated to perform. This paper studies a change in major requirements that associates a major field test to a grade in a capstone course, when it previously counted for nothing. After controlling for possibly confounding factors, a modest but robust treatment effect was found. Adding stakes also appears to cause MFT scores to correlate more strongly with other measures of student learning, which suggests more accurate assessment.

![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://preprints.apsanet.org/engage/assets/public/apsa/logo/orcid.png)