Continental sovereignty: constructing institutional and structural changes in the international system


This paper constructs the African Union (AU) claim of sovereignty within the debate among international relations scholars about change and continuity in “institutions” and “structures” of the international system. I develop a theory of change: internationalization of authority transformed international organizations (IOs) into state structures possessing sovereignty as transferred authority. Dominant IOs, like the UN, are legitimated by constituent structures, including regional organizations. But there has been a legitimation crisis as the constituent structures oppose dominant IOs’ legitimacy. The rules of IO legitimation must comprise a complete representation of constituent structures in decision-making organs and the alignment of norms, values, priorities, interests, or goals with constituent structures. Noncompliance with these rules will cause fundamental changes. I base the theory on constructivist accounts of change. Specifically, the sovereignty framework, which I expand using studies on IO authority and legitimacy, internationalization of the state, the third image of structure, and new regionalism.



Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .