The Subfields of [Regional] Studies

02 May 2024, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

The field of regional studies remains a fuzzy branch of knowledge. The structure of regional studies remains the subject of considerable debate within the scholarly community. Such a disagreement over its building blocks and their relationships represents a major barrier to the further development of the field as an interdisciplinary endeavor. In pursuit of progress, it may be helpful to take a closer look at general taxonomies that can be used to classify and/or categorize the core concepts that are located within this field of study., This article attempts to do just that. After considering the relevant core concepts, it proposes a lightweight ontology that could be used to formally define the subfields of regional studies and the relations that exist between them. To be clear, the adoption of this generalized way of thinking would mark a radical departure from the status quo.

Keywords

Regional Studies
Area Studies
International Relations
Education
Policy
Interdisciplinary
Taxonomy
Concepts
Social Ontology
Political Science
John Searle
Global Studies
Transnationality
Geographic Seams
Transregionalism
Multiregionalism
Regionalism
Border Studies
Foreign Policy
Epistemology
Ontology

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.