Deal or No Deal: Voting on Multiple Provision Ballot Measures

06 August 2024, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Ballot propositions provide an instance of direct democracy in which voters have a say in a state’s legislative process. However, voters vary in how they understand and evaluate these measures, many of which can be complicated and comprised of multiple provisions. Are voters deliberate legislators, or do they instead rely on heuristics to guide their final decision? When multiple provisions exist within a single proposition, how do voters weigh their varying support of provisions in their calculus of overall support for the proposition? To examine these questions, we conduct a novel survey utilizing three real ballot measures under consideration during 2022. By experimentally assigning how we ask respondents for their support of a given ballot proposition, we garner insight into how voters approach voting on ballots and their greater decision-making process. We find evidence of a negativity bias, which is strongest on the most complex and least polarized issue

Keywords

ballot propositions
ballot measures
multiple provisions
negativity bias
direct democracy
survey experiment

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Appendix
Description
Supplementary online appendix for "Deal or No Deal: Voting on Multiple Provision Ballot Measures"
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.