Abstract
Ballot propositions provide a unique instance of direct democracy in which voters have a say in a state’s legislative process. However, voters vary in how they understand and evaluate these measures, which can be relatively complicated and comprised of multiple provisions. When multiple provisions exist within a single proposition, how do voters weigh their varying support of provisions in their calculus of overall support? Are voters deliberate legislators, or do they instead rely on heuristics to guide their final decision? To examine these questions, we conduct a novel survey utilizing three real ballot measures under consideration during the 2022 midterm election cycle. By experimentally assigning how we ask respondents for their support of a given ballot proposition, we garner insight into how voters approach voting on ballots and their greater decision-making process. We find evidence of a negativity bias, which is strongest on the most complex and least polarized issue.

![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://preprints.apsanet.org/engage/assets/public/apsa/logo/orcid.png)