Worth a Try? The Electoral Consequences of Symbolic Legislation

03 February 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Despite the prevalence of "symbolic legislating" in the US Congress, little is known about its electoral implications. It is possible that voters reward their legislator’s efforts to move the status quo closer to their position, even if it has no chance of becoming law. On the other hand, because symbolic legislation is doomed to fail, it may decrease a legislator’s perceived effectiveness and, thus, their political support. Alternatively, it is possible that sponsoring symbolic legislation has no impact. In this Short Research Article, we test these competing hypotheses using a survey experiment and observational data. Our experimental results demonstrate that, assuming shared party and issue position, symbolic legislation is strongly rewarded. The effect is even stronger among voters who are most likely to attend to this information in the real world. Finally, we test for this pattern using real-world data on legislators’ behavior and find clear evidence for it.

Keywords

symbolic legislation
voting
congress
representation

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.