The Janus Face of the State: The Dialectic of Sacrifice Versus Personal Gain and Electoral Conflict in Kenya (1991-2022)

09 December 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Despite institutional modernization since 1991, Kenya faces persistent electoral volatility. Utilizing the "Dialectic of Sacrifice versus Personal Gain" framework and documentary analysis (1991–2022), this article interrogates this paradox. It argues that stability is undermined by two conflicting imperatives: the "Vocation of Sacrifice," requiring elites to perform moral custodianship for legitimacy, and the "Material Imperative," necessitating state capture to finance patronage. This collision transforms elections into zero-sum existential struggles where violence is a rational strategy against economic exclusion. The study demonstrates that the 2010 Constitution and devolution merely decentralized this predatory logic to county governments, creating localized conflict arenas. Furthermore, a culture of "performative legality" paralyzes enforcement mechanisms to preserve elite impunity. Ultimately, the article concludes that resolving Kenya’s recurring crisis requires decoupling political power from private accumulation.

Keywords

Kenya
Electoral Conflict
Dialectic of Sacrifice
State Capture
Neopatrimonialism
Political Economy
Devolution
Performative Legality.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.