The Ideological Peace

14 January 2026, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

How does ideology impact international politics? Scholars have highlighted the role of ideological preferences about the appropriate process of policymaking, especially democracy versus nondemocracy. However, we argue that beliefs about the appropriate outcome of policymaking are also highly germane. People view foreign countries that share their individual left-wing or right-wing ideology as being less threatening, and are less supportive of sanctions and the use of force against them. We term this dynamic the “left/right peace.” These two faces of ideology are additive. Observers in democratic countries are especially disinclined to engage in conflict if a foreign state is aligned on both ideological dimensions, which we term the “ideological peace.” Four survey experiments in two countries and an analysis of militarized interstate disputes provide strong evidence for our argument. Our theory significantly contributes to debates about whether politics stops at the water’s edge and the impact of polarization on political violence.

Keywords

democratic peace
polarization
left-wing peace
right-wing peace
in-group bias
water's edge
ideology

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.