AI, Race, and Politics

04 May 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

AI systems are reshaping racial and ethnic power dynamics across politics, governance, and scholarly inquiry, yet political science lacks systematic frameworks for analyzing when, where, and through what mechanisms these effects occur. This chapter surveys knowledge across three areas: 1) government use of AI in service delivery, surveillance, and coercive administration; 2) AI's impact on political information environments, mobilization, and electoral administration; and 3) AI as research infrastructure in the production of political knowledge. The methodology section examines how AI tools can introduce systematic distortions that standard disclosure practices do not address. In response, the chapter proposes an AI Measurement Statement (AIMS), a disclosure framework informed by practices in machine learning research and industry, designed to surface group-differentiated measurement risks and support transparency, construct validity, and cumulative knowledge production across political science subfields.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence
Algorithmic discrimination
Racial bias
differential performance
measurement validity
disclosure standards
Minority political participation
government adminstration

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.