Abstract
This paper examines how “project institutions”, rules and organizations created by implementers and participants during people-to-people (P2P) peacebuilding interventions, sustain positive intergroup attitudes and collaboration beyond project closure. While contact theory has focused on short-term intervention outcomes, long-term pathways remain undertheorized. We utilize quantitative and qualitative data to conduct an evaluation of ten USAID-funded P2P activities in Colombia, Nigeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Zimbabwe. Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), this paper identifies project institutions as a key condition for enduring attitudinal and behavioral change and specifies the mechanisms by which institutions operate post-closure. Findings show that institutions persist through positive feedback — coordination with local entities, high setup costs that foster continued use, and low-cost upkeep enabled by communication technologies. By bridging contact and institutional, this paper illuminates program design factors that may enable resilience of engineered norms, organizations, and attitudes and should be causally tested in future studies.
Supplementary weblinks
Title
Long-term Evaluation of the Center for Conflict and Violence Prevention (CVP) Reconciliation Fund Activities
Description
This report presents the findings, annexes, and supplementary materials and data of the ERIE Consortium's (The Expanding the Reach of Impact Evaluation) multi-country retrospective evaluation, which examined the long-term effects of ten People-to-People (P2P) peacebuilding programs funded by USAID's Center for Conflict and Violence Prevention’s (CVP) Reconciliation fund Program (RfP).
Actions
View 
![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://preprints.apsanet.org/engage/assets/public/apsa/logo/orcid.png)