Costly Neighbors? Housing, Crime, and Support for Redistribution

11 September 2026, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Public housing is often blamed for generating crime, though evidence is mixed and drawn mostly from Global North contexts. We ask whether public housing actually increases crime, and how such beliefs shape support for redistribution. Studying Brazil's \textit{Minha Casa, Minha Vida}—one of the world's largest public housing programs—we combine multiple causal designs with an original survey. We find no evidence that public housing raises beneficiary, neighborhood, or city-wide crime: beneficiaries report high residential satisfaction; treated neighborhoods show no increase across crime indicators; and cities with exogenous increases in housing see homicide rates decline, even among vulnerable groups. A survey experiment shows that support for public housing depends less on whether it is linked to crime than on who is perceived to bear its costs. Support holds when costs are framed as confined to beneficiaries, but collapses when crime is framed as spilling beyond them.

Keywords

crime
redistribution
political economy
public housing
Brazil

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Appendix
Description
Appendix materials
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.