The Unintended Consequences of Democratic Reforms: Electronic Voting and Criminal Violence in Brazil

09 September 2020, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Under what conditions can democracy reduce violent conflict? We argue that, in weakly institutionalized contexts, institutional reforms that promote the rise of programmatic parties decrease levels of violence. We exploit the implementation of a political reform in Brazil that gradually introduced electronic voting to reduce electoral fraud. Using a regression discontinuity design, we show that violence decreased by a half standard deviation in municipalities where electronic voting was first adopted, relative to those where the technology was not implemented. We show that by reducing fraud and increasing enfranchisement, electronic voting eroded the power of hegemonic political machines more likely to collude with organized criminal groups. These results, we show, cannot be explained by higher investments in security or social programs. Our paper sheds light on the links between criminal violence and elections, the alternatives to iron-fist policies, and the unintended consequences of democratic reforms in weakly institutionalized contexts.

Keywords

democratic reforms
electronic vote
violence
fraud
Brazil

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.