Why (Not) Talk About Human Rights? Politics in the Global Digital Compact

12 June 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

This paper examines the politics behind global shifts in human rights-based language regarding the Internet. It uses the case of the Global Digital Compact to test the ability of International Relations theories to explain these shifts. The Global Digital Compact is an digital cooperation and Internet governance framework facilitated by the United Nations and endorsed by 93 countries, as of 2024. I analyze 174 documents used in the negotiation of the compact. These documents were authored by civil society, academic, private sector, government, and technical community actors from the Global South and North. I integrate qualitative content analysis, network analysis, and topic modeling to measure differences in the frequency and relationships among rights presented in the documents. Contrary to a historical focus on civil and political rights, I found that many actors, including the technical community, focus more on economic, social, and cultural rights than on civil and political rights.

Keywords

Internet Governance
Human Rights
Global Digital Compact
Qualitative Content Analysis
Natural Language Processing
Digital Divide
International Relations

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.